交通部门监管与交通参与人违法占用应急车道行为演化博弈分析

牟玲玲, 涂家婷, 付一帆

北京交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4) : 76-86.

PDF(797 KB)
欢迎访问《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》官方网站!今天是
PDF(797 KB)
北京交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4) : 76-86.
应用经济研究

交通部门监管与交通参与人违法占用应急车道行为演化博弈分析

  • 牟玲玲1, 涂家婷2, 付一帆3
作者信息 +

Game Analysis of Traffic Department Supervision and Evolution of Traffic Participants’ Illegal Occupation of Emergency Lane

  • MU Ling-ling1, TU Jia-ting2, FU Yi-fan3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

社会车辆违法占用应急车道会扰乱正常的交通秩序,影响应急车道在紧急情况发生时的疏导、应急作用。针对城市环线、快速路及高速路两侧的社会车辆违法占用应急车道问题,结合考虑第三方群众的监督举报作用、电子监控的抓拍作用,构建交通参与人与交通部门之间的演化博弈模型。建立复制动态方程,通过演化稳定策略分析及仿真分析,得到不同情形下交通部门和交通参与人的演化稳定策略。研究表明:交通部门与交通参与人的决策依据均趋向于收益最大化原则或成本最低原则;第三方举报率越大、电子监控抓拍率越大、收益损失比越小,交通部门越趋向于被动监管;被查处时交通参与人受到的惩罚力度越大、配合调查成本越高,交通部门主动监管成功率越高;交通部门在保证较高监管成功率前提下,更倾向于选择被动监管策略。结合以上结论,提出交通部门采用新技术降本增效、倡导公众积极检举、强化监管、处罚力度,可以促使双方博弈策略朝着有利于交通部门监管的方向发展。

Abstract

Aiming at illegal occupation of emergency lane by social vehicles on roadsides of city loop, expressway and highway, the evolutionary game model between traffic participants and traffic department is constructed by considering the supervision and reporting by third-party public and the use of electronic monitoring. By establishing the replication dynamic equation, the stable evolution strategies of traffic department and traffic participants are obtained through evolution stability strategy analysis and simulation analysis. The research shows that the decision-making of both traffic department and traffic participants tends to observe the principle of maximization of revenue or the principle of lowest cost. The higher the third-party reporting rate and electronic monitoring capture rate, the smaller the income loss ratio, and the more likely the traffic department is to adopt passive supervision. The greater the punishment and the higher the cost of cooperation with investigation, the higher the success rate of active supervision by the traffic department. Under the premise of ensuring a high success rate of regulation, the traffic department tends to choose passive supervision strategy. Therefore, it is suggested that traffic department can adopt new technology to reduce cost and increase efficiency, call on the public to actively report illegal occupations and strengthen supervision and punishment to prompt two sides to take game strategy that develop in the direction conductive to the supervision of traffic department.

关键词

交通工程 / 应急车道 / 演化博弈 / 交通部门 / 交通参与人

Key words

traffic engineering / emergency lane / evolutionary game / traffic department / traffic participants

引用本文

导出引用
牟玲玲, 涂家婷, 付一帆. 交通部门监管与交通参与人违法占用应急车道行为演化博弈分析[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2022, 21(4): 76-86
MU Ling-ling, TU Jia-ting, FU Yi-fan. Game Analysis of Traffic Department Supervision and Evolution of Traffic Participants’ Illegal Occupation of Emergency Lane[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition). 2022, 21(4): 76-86
中图分类号: D63-3    D630.8   

参考文献

1 杨露萍,钱大琳.小汽车通勤向公共交通转移演化博弈分析[J].北京交通大学学报,2014,38(2):151-156.
2 MAYNARD SMITH J.The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,1974,47(1):209-221.
3 郭静秋,方守恩,曲小波,等.基于强化协作博弈方法的双车道混合交通流特性[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(7):976-983.
4 李祯琪,欧国立.激励性和惩罚性交通拥堵治理政策的比较——基于动态演化博弈模型及仿真分析[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(6):167-178.
5 UCHIYAMA N, TANIGUCHI E.A Study of Dispatcher’s Route Choice Model Based on Evolutionary Game Theory[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012, 39(39): 495-509.
6 徐莹,张雪梅,曹柬.雾霾背景下政府监管与交通企业低碳行为演化博弈[J].系统管理学报,2018,27(3):462-469+477.
7 魏丽英,崔裕枫,李东莹.基于演化博弈论的行人与机动车冲突演化机理研究[J].物理学报,2018,67(19):37-49.
8 卢维科,刘澜,冯伟.基于相邻相位合作博弈的单信号交叉口实时滚动优化建模和仿真[J].公路交通科技,2015,32(11):120-125+131.
9 NARANG A , SHAIJU A J . Evolutionary Stability of Polymorphic Profiles in Asymmetric Games[J]. Dynamic Games and Applications, 2019, 9(4): 1126-1142.
10 CHENG J S, GONG B G, LI B Y. Cooperation strategy of technology licensing based on evolutionary game[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 268(1-2): 387-404.
11 王璐,叶顺强,谢能刚.基于脏脸博弈模型的人车路口穿越行为研究[J].物理学报,2015,64(12):76-86.
12 张晓雨,王颖杰,鲍梦婷,等.车道被占用对城市道路通行能力的影响[J].汕头大学学报(自然科学版),2014,29(3):5-17.
13 PINASCO J P, CARTABIA M R, SAINTIER N. A Game Theoretic Model of Wealth Distribution[J]. Dynamic Games and Applications, 2018,8(4): 874-890.
14 GHATAK A, MUKHERJEE D, RAO K. A Spatial Game Theoretic Analysis of Conflict and Identity[J]. Computational Economics, 2018, 52(2): 493-519.
15 王健,胡晓伟,佟晶晶,等.基于车道建模的区域应急疏散路径规划[J].交通运输工程学报,2010,10(2):82-87.
16 王方,王晓原,刘振雪,等.基于完全信息多人动态博弈的车道选择模型[J].计算机工程与应用,2018,54(23):238-245.
17 赵韩涛,毛宏燕.有应急车辆影响的多车道交通流元胞自动机模型[J].物理学报,2013,62(6):53-60.
18 王健,程苑,张哲宁.基于演化博弈论的汽车共享与私家车博弈研究[J].交通信息与安全,2017,35(2):89-93.
19 林小梅,邵春福,钱剑培,等.通行政策导向下节假日出行结构动态演化博弈[J].北京交通大学学报,2016,40(6):70-75+82.
20 张亚平,宋成举,程绍武,等.城市公共交通监管博弈建模与仿真[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2016,48(9):24-29.
21 王秋平,华震,孙皓.历史街区慢行交通分担量的博弈预测方法[J].中国公路学报,2016,29(9):128-135.
22 李学文,徐丽群.城市轨道交通运营效率评价——基于改进的博弈交叉效率方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(4):973-980.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目“住房租赁市场核心主体决策行为博弈及协调机制研究”(71904042)。

PDF(797 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/