连片特困地区县域交通扶贫效率测度及影响因素——以滇西边境山区为例

戢晓峰, 曹瑞, 陈方, 韩春阳, 李晓娟

北京交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2) : 124-136.

PDF(2424 KB)
欢迎访问《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》官方网站!今天是
PDF(2424 KB)
北京交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2) : 124-136.
管理研究

连片特困地区县域交通扶贫效率测度及影响因素——以滇西边境山区为例

  • 戢晓峰1,2,4, 曹瑞1,2,4, 陈方2,3,4, 韩春阳1,2,4, 李晓娟1
作者信息 +

Measurements of the Efficiency of County Transport-Driven Poverty Alleviation and the Influencing Factors in Contiguous Poverty-Stricken Areas: A Case Study of the Border Mountainous Areas in Western Yunnan

  • JI Xiao-feng1,2,4, CAO Rui1,2,4, CHEN Fang2,3,4, HAN Chun-yang1,2,4, LI Xiao-juan1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

交通扶贫效率测度可为乡村振兴阶段区域交通规划方案制定提供重要的理论依据。以滇西边境山区56个县域四年间交通与经济发展面板数据为样本,构建交通扶贫效率投入产出指标体系,运用DEA模型、Malmquist指数测度滇西边境山区各县交通扶贫效率,并分析其时空分布特征。同时,构建Tobit回归模型,探究县域交通扶贫效率的影响因素。研究表明:滇西边境山区县域交通扶贫效率整体呈逐步增长态势,在乡村振兴阶段仍然有较大提升空间,且交通扶贫综合效率主要受到规模效率的影响;滇西边境山区县域交通扶贫效率大幅提升;依据交通扶贫综合效率的平均值和Malmquist指数值两个维度,滇西边境山区56个县可划分为潜力型、发展型、成熟型及巩固型4种类型,而发展型和成熟型是滇西边境山区交通扶贫效率的主要形态;县域规模、产业结构对交通扶贫效率的提升具有反向抑制作用,就业支持、消费水平、区位优势、投资规模均在不同程度上对滇西边境山区交通扶贫效率产生正向促进作用;各影响因素对不同发展阶段的县域交通扶贫效率在影响强度和作用路径上存在差异。因此,应进一步优化县城交通基础设施空间布局,强化劳动力就业等因素与交通运输发展的“联动效应”,针对不同交通扶贫发展阶段及影响因素短板,采取差异化、合理化发展策略。

Abstract

The study on the efficiency of transport-driven poverty alleviation can provide an important theoretical basis for the formulation of regional poverty alleviation-oriented transport policies in the stage of rural revitalization. Panel data of transportation and economic development in 56 counties in the border mountainous areas of western Yunnan from 2016-2019 are used as samples to construct a transport-driven poverty alleviation efficiency input-output index system. The DEA model and Malmquist index are used to measure the transport-driven poverty alleviation efficiency of counties, and analyze their spatial and temporal distribution characteristics. At the same time, Tobit regression model is constructed to explore the factors influencing the efficiency of county-level transport-driven poverty alleviation. The results show that: 1) The overall efficiency of transport-driven poverty alleviation in the mountainous counties along the border of western Yunnan shows a gradual growth. There is still large room for improvement in the stage of rural revitalization, and the comprehensive efficiency of transport-driven poverty alleviation is mainly influenced by the scale efficiency. 2) According to two dimensions of comprehensive efficiency average of transport-driven poverty alleviation and Malmquist index value, the 56 counties in western Yunnan can be divided into four types: potential, developmental, mature and consolidation types. The developmental and mature types are main types of efficiency for transport-driven poverty alleviation in the border mountainous areas of western Yunnan. 3) County size and industrial structure have a reverse inhibitory effect on the improvement of transport-driven poverty alleviation efficiency, while employment support, consumption level, location advantage, and investment scale all have a certain positive promoting effect on transport-driven poverty alleviation efficiency in the border mountainous areas of western Yunnan to different degrees. Each influencing factor shows differences in terms of its influence intensity and effect path on the county transport-driven poverty alleviation efficiency in different development stages. Therefore, we should further optimize the spatial layout of the county transportation infrastructure, attach importance to the development of digital and intelligent transportation, strengthen the “linkage effect” between labor employment and transportation development, and adopt differentiated and rational development strategies based on different development stages of transport-driven poverty alleviation and characteristics of influencing factors.

关键词

交通扶贫效率 / 测度 / 影响因素 / DEA-Malmquist模型 / 滇西边境山区

Key words

transport-driven poverty alleviation efficiency / measurements / influence factors / DEA-Malmquist model / border mountainous areas in western Yunnan

引用本文

导出引用
戢晓峰, 曹瑞, 陈方, 韩春阳, 李晓娟. 连片特困地区县域交通扶贫效率测度及影响因素——以滇西边境山区为例[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2024, 23(2): 124-136
JI Xiao-feng, CAO Rui, CHEN Fang, HAN Chun-yang, LI Xiao-juan. Measurements of the Efficiency of County Transport-Driven Poverty Alleviation and the Influencing Factors in Contiguous Poverty-Stricken Areas: A Case Study of the Border Mountainous Areas in Western Yunnan[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition). 2024, 23(2): 124-136
中图分类号: F252   

参考文献

1 戢晓峰,李晓娟,陈方,等.精准扶贫以来中国交通扶贫的政策演进与实践经验[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(6):71-79.
2 [英]亚当·斯密. 国富论[M]. 郭大力, 王亚南译.北京:商务印书馆, 1981.
3 ASCHAUER D A. Is Public Expenditure Productive? [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1989, 23(2): 177-200.
4 ELBURZ Z, NIJKAMP P, PELS E. Public Infrastructure and Regional Growth: Lessons from Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 58(1):1-8.
5 张学良.中国交通基础设施促进了区域经济增长吗——兼论交通基础设施的空间溢出效应[J].中国社会科学,2012,(3):60-77+206.
6 曹小曙,徐建斌,李涛,等.地理可达性减贫效应与机理研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2021,36(11):1105-1116.
7 戢晓峰,李武,郝京京.连片特困地区可达性与贫困程度的空间耦合模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2017,17(4):33-39.
8 王武林,杨文越,曹小曙.中国集中连片特困地区公路交通优势度及其对经济增长的影响[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(6):665-675.
9 王海江,苗长虹,乔旭宁.中国公路交通联系的空间结构解析——兼论与贫困地区空间关系[J].经济地理,2018,38(5):52-59.
10 李东坤,郑浩生,张晓玲.交通基础设施建设能减缓城镇贫困吗?[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,23(1):89-97+108.
11 徐瑾,潘俊宇.交通基础设施促进经济增长的时空差异与机制分析——基于双向固定效应模型的研究[J].经济问题探索,2019,(12):29-42.
12 MENGTIAN C, DINGDE X, FANGTING X, et al. The Influence Factors Analysis of Households' Poverty Vulnerability in Southwest Ethnic Areas of China Based on the Hierarchical Linear Model: A Case Study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture [J]. Applied Geography, 2016, 66:144-152.
13 刘明,刘渝琳,丁从明.政府投资对区域经济发展的双门槛效应 [J].经济问题探索,2013,(6):21-31.
14 任晓红,张宗益.交通基础设施、要素流动与城乡收入差距[J].管理评论,2013,25(2):51-59.
15 李忠民,夏德水,姚宇.长江经济带交通基础设施效率分析——基于DEA模型的Malmqusit指数方法[J].技术经济,2014,33(7):62-68.
16 梁稳稳,左庆乐.丝绸之路经济带沿线省份交通基础设施利用效率测度与提升[J].开发研究,2019,(6):110-115.
17 陈鹏,李建贵,黄智君.新疆国家级贫困县扶贫效率的时间演进与空间分异研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(10):166-175.
18 余荣辉.长江经济带旅游产业效率评价及影响因素研究[D].重庆: 重庆工商大学经济学院,2020.
19 穆学青,郭向阳,明庆忠.多维贫困视角下县域旅游扶贫效率时空演化及影响机理——以云南25个边境县(市)为例[J].经济地理,2020,40(12):199-210.
20 孙靖.中国区域建筑业能源效率测度与评价[D].合肥:安徽建筑大学经济与管理学院,2015.
21 刘秉镰,武鹏,刘玉海.交通基础设施与中国全要素生产率增长——基于省域数据的空间面板计量分析[J].中国工业经济,2010,(3):54-64.
22 王予波.云南省人民政府工作报告[EB/OL].(2021-02-01)[2022-10-13]. http://www.yn.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgk/zfgzbg/202104/t20210408_219964.html.
23 陈垚,汪晓文,张国兴.交通基础设施对农村减贫的门槛效应研究[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(5):110-123.
24 林永然.交通基础设施对区域贫困的影响研究——基于省域面板数据的实证检验[J].学习论坛,2021,(1):115-121.
25 AGGARWAL S. Do Rural Roads Create Pathways Out of Poverty? Evidence from India [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2018,133(4):375-395.
26 高志刚,代晓敏,克甝.全生命周期视角下交通基础设施对区域经济差距的影响:传导机制与实证检验[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,(6):94-106.
27 汪德根,沙梦雨,赵美风.国家级贫困县脱贫力空间格局及分异机制[J].地理科学,2020,40(7):1072-1081.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(42061030);云南省交通运输厅科技创新及示范项目“乡村振兴战略导向下云南省欠发达地区公路交通资源配置优化技术”。

PDF(2424 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/