摘要
公证制度是重要的预防性司法制度,我国公证机构经“去行政化”改革后,由单一行政体制转变为事业体制与合作制双轨并存模式,由于公证立法未对合作制公证机构民事主体定位予以规制,导致各界对其民事主体属性的认识存在争议,制约了合作制公证机构职能的发挥和公证体制机制改革的深化。《民法典》突破了民事主体立法独立责任与法人人格附随性传统,在法律另有规定的情况下,非法人组织的成员亦可承担有限责任。《公证法》规定公证机构依法设立,不以营利为目的,独立行使公证职能、承担民事责任。在《民法典》视野下,合作制公证机构的财产由合作人共有,不符合法人成立条件,不具法人人格。从《民法典》蕴含的团体人格和成员有限责任相分离的新理念出发,《公证法》修法时可将合作制公证机构规制为合作人以出资额为限对机构债务承担责任的非法人组织。
Abstract
The notary system is an important preventive judicial system. After the “de-administrativization” reform, China’s notary institutions have transformed from a single administrative system to a dual-track model where public institution system and cooperative system coexist. Due to the lack of regulation on the civil subject positioning of cooperative notary institutions in the legislation, there are controversies in the understanding of their civil subject attributes across all sectors, which hinders the full play of the functions of cooperative notary institutions and the deepening of mechanism reforms in the notary system. The Civil Code has broken through the traditional legislative model where civil subjects’ independent liability is attached to corporate personality. Under circumstances where laws provide otherwise, members of unincorporated organizations may also bear limited liability. The Notarization Law stipulates that notary institutions shall be established in accordance with the law, operate non-commercially, exercise notarization functions independently, and assume civil liabilities. From the perspective of The Civil Code, the property of cooperative notary institutions is jointly owned by the partners, which does not meet the conditions for the establishment of a legal person and thus lacks legal personality. However, based on the new concept in The Civil Code that separates group personality from members’ limited liability, when amending the Notarization Law, cooperative notary institutions can be regulated as unincorporated organizations in which partners bear responsibilities for the debts of the institutions within the limit of their capital contributions.
关键词
非法人组织 /
有限责任 /
合作制公证机构 /
公证
Key words
unincorporated organization /
limited liability /
cooperative notary institution /
notarization
王明玉, 梅夏英.
论合作制公证机构的民事主体属性[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2025, 24(2): 128-136
WANG Ming-yu, MEI Xia-ying.
On the Civil Subject Attributes of Cooperative Notary Institutions[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition). 2025, 24(2): 128-136
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
1 广东省司法厅课题组.广东省合作制公证机构试点改革的探索与启迪[J].中国公证,2019,(8):52-61.
2 汤维建,段明.合作制公证机构改革的抉择与困境[J].中国司法,2021,(2):79-87.
3 刘疆.机遇和挑战:合作制公证机构试点改革若干重大问题[J].中国公证,2019,(5):14-26.
4 谢江东.论合作制公证机构的非营利性和发展方向——以营利法人与非营利法人区分为视角[J].中国公证,2017,(11):45-53.
5 杨立新.公证机构的法律性质与三种模式[J].中国公证,2018,(1):16-17.
6 [德]卡尔·拉伦茨.德国民法通论[M].王晓晔等译.北京:法律出版社,2003:184.
7 董学立.法人人格与有限责任[J].现代法学,2001,(5):80-83.
8 任彦.非营利法人分类研究[D].北京:中国人民大学法学院,2016.
9 谭启平.民法总则的法人分类[J].法学家,2016,(5):39-53+181.
10 [美]亨利·汉斯曼.企业所有权论[M].于静译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:335-336.
11 应瑞瑶.合作社的异化与异化的合作社——兼论中国农业合作社的定位[J].江海学刊,2002,(6):68-74.
12 陈小君.《民法典》特别法人制度立法透视[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2021,(1):16-24.
13 张力.法人功能性分类与结构性分类的兼容解释[J].中国法学,2019,(2):148-166.
14 虞政平.法人独立责任质疑[J].中国法学,2001,(1):127-140.
15 [德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯.德国民法总论[M].邵建东译.北京:法律出版社,2000:853.
16 张新宝.民法总则规定的非法人组织基本问题研讨[J].比较法研究,2018,(3):69-86.
17 程守太.有限责任合伙事务所研究[D].成都:西南财经大学社会发展研究院,2006:57.
18 税兵.法人独立责任辨析——从语境论的研究进路出发[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(2):118-125.
19 柳经纬.民法典编纂中的法人制度重构[J].法学,2015,(5):14-22.
20 马俊驹.法人制度的历史演进、理论构建和中国课题[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2023,(1):6-25.
21 陈甦.民法总则评注[M].北京:法律出版社,2017:411.
22 李建伟.公司法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2022:7-8.
基金
北京市社会科学基金规划项目“混改背景下北京市属国企公司治理法律问题研究”(20FXC022)。