考虑路网动态性的危险品运输风险评估方法研究

崔汗星, 赵启兰, 宋光, 郭俊杰

北京交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 63-74.

PDF(1557 KB)
欢迎访问《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》官方网站!今天是
PDF(1557 KB)
北京交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 63-74.
物流研究

考虑路网动态性的危险品运输风险评估方法研究

  • 崔汗星1, 赵启兰1, 宋光2, 郭俊杰1
作者信息 +

On Risk Assessment Methods for Hazardous Goods Transportation Considering Road Network Dynamics

  • Cui Han-xing1, Zhao Qi-lan1, Song Guang2, Guo Jun-Jie1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

城市路网交通流量的动态特性使得城市危险品运输风险评估成为一个复杂的系统性问题。危险品道路运输风险评估应充分考虑城市路网的动态特征,以确保风险评估结果的科学性。本文基于期望风险的评估框架,考虑城市交通路网的动态变化特征和车辆行驶速度变化,将危险品运输视为一个风险随着时间在各路段逐步累积的过程,进而构建动态风险评估方法。研究结果表明:基于动态路网特性提出的城市危险品运输风险评估方法,能够较为精准地评估危险品车辆在动态路网中的风险水平;车辆行驶速度对危险品运输的风险水平影响显著。因此,企业可利用动态风险评估方法优化运输路线,相关管理部门可参考该方法制定更科学、有效的运输策略,提高运输安全的精准化管理水平。

Abstract

The dynamic characteristics of traffic flow in urban road networks make the risk assessment of hazardous goods transportation in cities a complex systemic issue. When conducting a risk assessment of road transportation of hazardous goods, the dynamic characteristics of urban road networks should be fully considered to ensure the scientific validity of the results. Based on the expected-risk assessment framework, this paper takes into account the dynamic change characteristics of the urban traffic road network and the variation in vehicle driving speeds, and treats the transportation of hazardous goods as a process in which risks gradually accumulate over time on each road section. Consequently, a dynamic risk assessment method is proposed. The research results indicate that the dynamic road network-based method proposed in this paper can evaluate more accurately the risk levels of hazardous goods transportation within dynamic road networks, with vehicle speed significantly impacting the risk levels of hazardous goods transportation. Therefore, it is advised that enterprises can utilize the dynamic risk assessment method to optimize transportation routes, and relevant management departments may refer to this method to formulate more scientific and effective transportation regulations, thereby enhancing the precision management level of transportation safety.

关键词

危险品运输 / 动态路网 / 风险评估 / 车辆行驶速度

Key words

hazardous goods transportation / dynamic road network / risk assessment / vehicle driving speed

引用本文

导出引用
崔汗星, 赵启兰, 宋光, 郭俊杰. 考虑路网动态性的危险品运输风险评估方法研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2025, 24(1): 63-74
Cui Han-xing, Zhao Qi-lan, Song Guang, Guo Jun-Jie. On Risk Assessment Methods for Hazardous Goods Transportation Considering Road Network Dynamics[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition). 2025, 24(1): 63-74
中图分类号: F252.1    U492.8   

参考文献

1 HUANG X, WANG X, PEI J, et al. Risk Assessment of the Areas Along the Highway Due to Hazardous Material Transportation Accidents[J]. Natural Hazards, 2018, 93(3): 1181-1202.
2 NIU S, UKKUSURI S V. Risk Assessment of Commercial Dangerous -Goods Truck Drivers Using Geo-Location Data: A Case Study in China[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 137.
3 WANG N, ZHANG M, CHE A, et al. Bi-Objective Vehicle Routing for Hazardous Materials Transportation With No Vehicles Travelling in Echelon[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 19(6): 1867-1879.
4 GARRIDO R A, BRONFMAN A C. Equity and Social Acceptability in Multiple Hazardous Materials Routing Through Urban Areas[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 102: 244-260.
5 HOSSEINI S D, VERMA M. A Value-At-Risk (VAR) Approach to Routing Rail Hazmat Shipments[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 54: 191-211.
6 HOSSEINI S D, VERMA M. Equitable Routing of Rail Hazardous Materials Shipments Using Cvar Methodology[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2021, 129.
7 ALP E. Risk-Based Transportation Planning Practice: Overall Methodology And A Case Example[J]. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 1995, 33(1): 4-19.
8 TIMAJCHI A, MIRZAPOUR AL-E-HASHEM S M J, REKIK Y. Inventory Routing Problem for Hazardous and Deteriorating Items in the Presence of Accident Risk With Transshipment Option[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 209: 302-315.
9 TEOH B E, PONNAMBALAM S G, SUBRAMANIAN N. Data Driven Safe Vehicle Routing Analytics: A Differential Evolution Algorithm to Reduce CO2 Emissions and Hazardous Risks[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 270(1): 515-538.
10 FRANK W C, THILL J C, BATTA R. Spatial Decision Support System for Hazardous Material Truck Routing[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2000, 8(1): 337-359.
11 贺政纲, 房杰, 张超. 时变条件下基于事故综合特征的危险品运输人口风险评估模型研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2017, 24(4): 168-172.
12 王蕾, 唐任伍. 超大城市治理难题与精细化治理对策[J]. 中国流通经济, 2023, 37(12): 18-25.
13 ERKUT E, VERTER V. Modeling of Transport Risk for Hazardous Materials[J]. Operations Research, 1998, 46(5): 625-642.
14 ZHU L, HU D. Study on the Vehicle Routing Problem Considering Congestion and Emission Factors[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(19): 6115-6129.
15 HAUER E. Speed and Safety[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009, 2103(1): 10-17.
16 ELVIK R. A Re-parameterisation of the Power Model of the Relationship between the Speed of Traffic and the Number of Accidents and Accident Victims[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2013, 50: 854-860.
17 ELVIK R, CHRISTENSEN P, AMUNDSEN A H. Speed and Road Accidents: An Evaluation of the Power Model[R]. 2004.
18 JOKSCH H C. Velocity Change and Fatality Risk in a Crash--A Rule Of Thumb[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1993, 25(1).

PDF(1557 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/