供应链冲击下中国企业的价值链升级路径研究 ——兼论价值链形态异质性的理论成因及其经验

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (13)

Download: PDF (2357 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Ensuring the security and stability of the industrial chain and supply chain is crucial to the high-quality development of China’s economy， therefore a comprehensive identification of the layout characteristics of firms value chain is urgently needed to explore high added-value upgrading path of various industries， so as to realize the strategic design and targeted policy implementation of different industries. This paper constructs a theoretical framework that can be used to study how firms with different value chain position and distribution achieve high added value increase. We use the merged data of the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms and the China Customs Data， and examine the relationship between firms’ position on value chain and the domestic value-added. We have the following findings： First， in general， the value-added of China’s manufacturing industry is reflected more in the upstream key components sector and downstream product marketing， while the added value of the intermediate manufacturing stage is relatively low. Second， the value chain distribution of different industries shows distinct heterogeneity， that is， some subdivided industries present a “smile curve” shape， some a “Musashi curve” and others a monotonous curve， therefore， their respective high added-value upgrading path should be differentiated. Third， the productivity gap and entry cost gap between the firm and its upstream and downstream firms are key to tell the value chain layout of industry. Fourth， firms should choose differentiated value chain upgrading strategies based on the configuration of the industry’s value chain and their own position， and selectively adopt “strength”， “supplement”， “extension”， and “concentration” measures to achieve targeted design of value chain upgrading strategy. Hence， it is crucial to adhere to the principle of “climbing up the both ends of the value chain to gain high added value”， while enhancing the innovation capabilities， emphasizing the manufacturing stages， and implementing targeted policies based on the value chain layout characteristics so as to guide firms in selecting effective upgrading strategies.

Key words： upgrading path for value chain value chain position supply chain shock

Received: 20 August 2024

PACS:	F27
	F42
	F74

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LV Yue
	ZHANG Hao-tian

Cite this article:

LV Yue,ZHANG Hao-tian. Value Chain Upgrading Path for Chinese Firms under the Supply Chain Shock： Also on Theoretical Causes and Empirical Analysis of the Heterogeneity of Value Chain[J]. journal6, 2024, 23(4): 78-96.

URL:

https://xbsk.bjtu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xbsk.bjtu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V23/I4/78

1 XING Y Q， DETERT N. How the iPhome Widensthe Umited States Trade Deficit with the People’s Republic of China［R］. ADBI Working Paper， 2010.
2 王岚，李宏艳.中国制造业融入全球价值链路径研究——嵌入位置和增值能力的视角［J］.中国工业经济，2015，（2）：76-88.
3 戴翔，李洲，何启志.中国制造业出口如何突破“天花板约束”［J］.统计研究，2018，35（6）：56-67.
4 MENG B， YE M， WEI S J， Measuring Smile Curves in Global Value Chains［J］. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics， 2020， 5：988-1016.
5 王茜.中国制造业是否应向“微笑曲线”两端攀爬——基于与制造业传统强国的比较分析［J］.财贸经济，2013，（8）：98-104.
6 倪红福.全球价值链中产业“微笑曲线”存在吗？——基于增加值平均传递步长方法［J］.数量经济技术经济研究，2016，33（11）：111-126+161.
7 高翔，黄建忠，袁凯华.价值链嵌入位置与出口国内增加值率［J］.数量经济技术经济研究，2019，36（6）：41-61.
8 潘文卿，李跟强.中国制造业国家价值链存在“微笑曲线”吗？——基于供给与需求双重视角［J］.管理评论，2018，30（5）：19-28.
9 JU J D， YU X. Productivity， Profitability， Production and Export Structures Along The Value Chain in China［J］. Journal of Comparative Economics， 2015， 43（1）： 33-54.
10 高翔，黄建忠，袁凯华.中国制造业存在产业“微笑曲线”吗？［J］.统计研究，2020，37（7）：15-29.
11 SHEN J H， DENG K， TANG S. Re-Evaluating the ‘Smile Curve’ in Relation to Outsourcing Industrialization［J］. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade， 2020， 57（5）：1247-1270.
12 ANTRAS P， CHOR D， FALLY T. Measuring the Upstreamness of Production and Trade Flows［J］. American Economic Review， 2012， 102（3）：412-416.
13 吕越，罗伟，包群.企业上游度、贸易危机与价值链传导的长鞭效应［J］.经济学（季刊），2020，19（3）：875-896.
14 KEE H L. TANG H W. Domestic Value Added in Exports： Theory and Firm Evidence from China［J］. American Economic Review， 2016， 106（6）：1402-1436.
15 吕越，盛斌，吕云龙.中国的市场分割会导致企业出口国内附加值率下降吗［J］.中国工业经济，2018，（5）：5-23.
16 CHOR D， MANOVA K， YU Z H. Growing like China： Firm performance and global production line position［J］. Journal of International Economics， 2021， 130.
17 CARVALHO V， NIREI M， SAITO Y U， et al. Supply Chain Disruptions： Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake［J］. Quarterly Journal of Economics， 2021， 136（2）：1255-1321.
18 包群，张志强.地震的余波：价值链断裂、进口停滞与贸易危机传染［J］.经济学（季刊），2021，21（2）：577-596.
19 BERNARD A， REDDING S， SCOTT P. Multi-Product Firms and Trade Liberalization［J］. Quarterly Journal of Economics， 2011， 126（3）：1271-1318.
20 SCHNELL M， WEINSTEIN D. Evaluating the Economie Response to Japan's Earthquake［R］. RIETI Policy Discussion Paper Series， 2012.
21 LU Y， TAO Z G， ZHU L M. Identifying FDI Spillovers［J］. Journal of International Economics， 2017， 107：75-90.
22 KOOPMAN R， WANG Z， WEI S J. Tracing Valueadded and Double Counting in Gross Exports［J］. American Economic Review， 2014， 104（2）：459-494.
23 BRANDT L， MORROW P. Tariffs and the Organization of Trade in China［J］. Journal of International Economics， 2017， 104：85-103.
24 周念利. 中国服务业改革对制造业微观生产效率的影响测度及异质性考察—基于服务中间投入的视角［J］.金融研究，2014，（9）：84-98.
25 GOLDBERG P， KHANDELWAL A， PAVCNIK N， et al. Multiproduct Firms and Product Turnover in the Developing World：Evidence from India［J］. The Review of Economics and Statistics， 2010， 92（4）：1042-1049.