On Teaching Models for In‑depth Industry‑University‑Research Integration in Art‑Engineering Interdisciplinary Fields: A Case Study of the School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University

ZHANG Ye, HU Ying-dong, ZHENG Fang, DONG Qing-feng, ZENG Zhong-zhong, LU Yuan, LI Jing-ya

Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3) : 111-118.

PDF(2229 KB)
Welcome to visit Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)!
PDF(2229 KB)
Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3) : 111-118.
Industry-University-Research Collaboration and Talent Cultivation

On Teaching Models for In‑depth Industry‑University‑Research Integration in Art‑Engineering Interdisciplinary Fields: A Case Study of the School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University

  • ZHANG Ye, HU Ying-dong, ZHENG Fang, DONG Qing-feng, ZENG Zhong-zhong, LU Yuan, LI Jing-ya
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation has generated an urgent demand for talents with art-engineering integration. However, the long-standing disconnection between industry and education in design disciplines within engineering-oriented universities severely constrains the cultivation of compound innovative talents. Grounded in the interdisciplinary characteristics of architecture, urban and rural planning, and design studies, this research focuses on three core contradictions in the industry-education integration of art-engineering interdisciplinary disciplines: the structural mismatch between disciplinary silos and industrial demands, the insufficient understanding and conceptual deviation regarding art-engineering integration, and the institutional absence of industry-education-research collaborative mechanisms. It proposes a tripartite platform system—comprising studios, key laboratories, and innovation institutes—as a pathway to address these challenges. Studios enable project-driven authentic scenario teaching; key laboratories facilitate the transformation of cutting-edge research into pedagogical resources; and innovation institutes serve as channels for the commercialization of research outputs. The synergistic operation of these three components establishes a closed-loop education ecosystem spanning the entire “industry-education-research” chain. Practice has demonstrated that this model effectively promotes the bidirectional translation of research outcomes into both pedagogical assets and industrial applications, offering a replicable implementation pathway for the high-quality development of art-engineering interdisciplinary design fields and the cultivation of compound top-notch innovative talents.

Key words

art-engineering integration / industry-education-research collaboration / studio system / tripartite platform / new quality productive forces

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Ye, HU Ying-dong, ZHENG Fang, DONG Qing-feng, ZENG Zhong-zhong, LU Yuan, LI Jing-ya. On Teaching Models for In‑depth Industry‑University‑Research Integration in Art‑Engineering Interdisciplinary Fields: A Case Study of the School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition). 2026, 25(3): 111-118

References

1 张博茜.跨学科合作驱动设计教育范式重构——访谈中国美术学院吴小华教授[J].设计艺术研究,2025,15(3):1-3.
2 国务院学位委员会 教育部关于印发《研究生教育学科专业目录(2022年)》《研究生教育学科专业目录管理办法》的通知[EB/OL]. (2022-09-14)[2026-06-06]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_833/202209/t20220914_660828.html.
3 李博.从技术叠加到价值创造:AI驱动下设计教育的交叉学科重构路径——访谈浙江大学孙守迁教授[J].设计艺术研究,2025,15(2):7-9.
4 湖南大学设计艺术学院. 精彩回顾-设计人工智能:从学科前沿到基础设施|胡飞教授谈同济实践[EB/OL]. (2026-06-05)[2026-06-06]. http://design.hnu.edu.cn/info/1032/9219.htm.
5 付学佳,项李,罗惠.产教融合视域下应用型高校设计学跨学科人才培养路径研究[J].应用型高等教育研究,2025,10(3):63-70.
PDF(2229 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉