Establishment and Improvement of a Shared Data Privacy Protection System

HUANG Dan

Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1) : 179-187.

PDF(560 KB)
Welcome to visit Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)!
PDF(560 KB)
Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1) : 179-187.
Law Studies

Establishment and Improvement of a Shared Data Privacy Protection System

  • HUANG Dan
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Data co-ownership is different from general property co-ownership; its essence lies in the co-ownership of the information contained therein. Differences in rights and obligations among data sharing subjects, varying risks of privacy disclosure for different subjects, and the co-governance nature of the exercise of subject rights all necessitate special protection for shared data privacy. At present, the protection of shared data privacy faces problems such as ambiguous boundaries of subject responsibilities, inadequate legal remedies, and the inability of infringement rules to adapt to technological development. China should adopt a scenario-based dynamic protection framework. By clarifying the allocation of rights and responsibilities among data co-owners, establishing real-time remedy channels for information subjects, and defining the infringement liability mechanism of co-owners, it can build a sound system of rules for shared data privacy protection and accelerate the implementation of privacy protection rules from a scenario-based perspective.

Key words

shared data / privacy protection / institutional framework / scenario

Cite this article

Download Citations
HUANG Dan. Establishment and Improvement of a Shared Data Privacy Protection System[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition). 2026, 25(1): 179-187

References

1 陈景辉.隐私的价值独特性:个人信息为何应受保护?[J].环球法律评论,2022,(1):36-52.
2 彭诚信.数据利用的根本矛盾何以消除——基于隐私、信息与数据的法理厘清[J].探索与争鸣,2022,(2):79-85.
3 王天恩.智能化时代隐私新问题及其应对[J].社会科学家,2023,(3):14-22.
4 许可.论个人信息保护法的权衡体系及其实践展开[J].法学家,2024,(4):62-74.
5 叶名怡.个人信息的侵权法保护[J].法学研究,2018,(4):83-102.
6 解正山.数据驱动时代的数据隐私保护——从个人控制到数据控制信息义务[J].法商研究,2020,(2):71-84.
7 吴钟灿,冯展畅.政府数据开放隐私保护的多元主体共生模式与实现路径[J].湖南行政学院学报,2024,(1):10-18.
8 董淑芬,李志详.大数据时代信息共享与隐私保护的冲突与平衡[J].南京社会科学,2021,(5):45-52.
9 张媛媛,邹静.“技术-隐私”视域下数字社会隐私保护的路径创新[J].社会科学研究,2022,(6):25-34.
10 赵精武.破除隐私计算的迷思:治理科技的安全风险与规制逻辑[J].华东政法大学学报,2022,(3):35-49.
11 郑志峰.人工智能时代的隐私保护[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2019,(2):51-60.
12 王利明.论数据权益:以“权利束”为视角[J].政治与法律,2022,(7):99-113.
13 梁慧星,陈华彬.物权法[M].北京:法律出版社,2020:227.
14 汪厚冬.数据个人与数据业者共有数据权的理论逻辑[J].私法,2023,44(3):122-140.,
15 吕智霞,杜放.共有数据隐私保护的对象明定、规制需求与理论落实[J].征信,2024,(10):1-11.
16 龙松熊.论侵害个人信息权益的损害赔偿[J].中国海商法研究,2023,(4):74-84.
17 丁凤玲.个人数据治理模式的选择:个人、国家还是集体[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,35(1):64-76.
18 黄尹旭,杨东.“利益—权利”双元共生:“数据要素×”的价值创造[J].中国社会科学,2024,(2):47-64.
19 王益民.关于建立中国特色社会主义数据共有制的研究[J].行政管理改革,2022,(5):16-22.
20 梅夏英.信息和数据概念区分的法律意义[J].比较法研究,2020,(6):151-162.
21 郑智航.数字资本运作逻辑下的数据权利保护[J].求是学刊,2021,48(4):113-126.
22 程啸.侵权责任法[M].北京:法律出版社,2021:110.
23 艾恒平.私权力有义务规制算法歧视吗?[J].法理——法哲学、法学方法论与人工智能,2023,(1):113-129.
24 闫立东.以“权利束”视角探究数据权利[J].东方法学,2019,(2):57-67.
PDF(560 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉