|
|
|
| On the Operation Mechanism of Patent Navigation for Universities from the Perspective of Organizational Structure Theory： A Multi-case Study |
| ZHANG Ling-yu1, ZHOU Jing1, WANG Xinb, JIA Hong-jun3 |
1.a School of Economics and Management
b.Institute of Science and Technology， Beijing Jiaotong University， Beijing 100044， China
2.Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property， Tongji University， Shanghai 200082， China. |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Taking Mintzberg’s organizational structure theory as analysis framework， this paper examines the structural elements and operating mechanisms of patent navigation for universities in four case universities. The study found that the patent navigation of all the case universities was currently driven by the strategic high-level management and provided the operation core service through the middle line based on the existing intellectual property management system with the cooperation and support of the technical structure and supporting structure. Additionally， the case universities presented heterogeneity in the strategic high-level management， in specific， the intellectual property leadership team of different universities selected different department heads to join in， such as the head of the audit department， the graduate school， and the president’s office， which reflected different tendencies in intellectual property management decisions. The intellectual property management operations of the case universities were heterogeneous in terms of technical structure， which can be summarized into three types： operation-oriented， management-operation collaborative， and management-operation integrated. The paper suggests that in order to explore a path for patent navigation that adapts to the development of each university， university administrators should increase their emphasis on patent navigation and designate a project coordinator dedicated to coordinate patent navigation projects to ensure the balance among numerous administrators in the matrix structure； meanwhile， scientific researchers should change their inherent cognition， fully and deeply understand patent navigation， and effectively integrate it into scientific research.
|
|
Received: 06 May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 高等学校知识产权管理规范（GB/T 33251-2016）［S］.北京：中国标准出版社，2017.
2 陈春霞，陈春莲.关于我国大学知识产权管理机构设置研究［J］.教育理论与实践，2020，40（12）：14-16.
3 周静，张凌宇，贾宏君.高校专利导航的理论视角和概念研究［J］.管理科学学报，2021，24（10）：22-33.
4 陈燕，孙全亮，孙玮.新时代专利导航的理论构建与实践路径［J］.知识产权，2020，（4）：16-31.
5 花之蕾.高校专利导航理论探索与实践——以华北电力大学的实践为例［J］.中国高校科技，2021，（3）：80-85.
6 MINTZBERG H. Structure in FIVES： Designing effective organizations［M］. New Jersey： Prentice－Hall，Inc，1993
7 SCOTT W R， DAVIS G F. Organizations and organizing： Rational， natural， and open system perspectives［M］.Upper Sadle River： Pearson，2007.
8 薛桐，郑毅，刘文斌.组织结构视角下我国高校绩效管理框架研究［J］.科研管理，2016，37（9）：145-151.
9 罗伯特?K. 殷，周海涛，李永贤，等. 案例研究：设计与方法［M］.重庆：重庆大学出版社， 2010.
10 EISENHARDT K M. Building theories from case study research［J］.The Academy of Management Review，1989，（14）： 532-550.
11 YIN R K. Case Study Research： Design and Methods［M］.Thousand Oaks： Sage Publication Inc.，1994.
12 张明，张莹，李艳国.高校图书馆智库的组织架构及职能定位研究［J］.图书馆工作与研究， 2016， （4）：12-19.
13 孙秀霞 朱方伟. 项目驱动型组织如何破解效率与柔性的均衡困境——一项多案例比较研究［J］. 南开管理评论， 2016， 19（5）：77-90.
14 张光军，吕紫瑜，刘人境.大科学工程组织结构评价与选择——基于弱矩阵，平衡矩阵和强矩阵组织结构的对比［J］.科技进步与对策， 2019，36（13）：17-26. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 23 
