监管处罚、资本监管压力与银行风险承担

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (582 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Risk prevention and financial stability is an important goal of regulatory authorities. In recent years， the CBRC is increasingly imposing penalties on commercial banks. Can penalties reduce the risk behaviors of the banking industry？ Using the unbalanced panel data of China’?s banking industry and administrative penalty data of the CBRIC from 2007 to 2018， this paper examines effects of regulatory penalties on bank risk-taking. The results show that， firstly， regulatory penalties have significant inhibitory effect on banks’ risk behavior. Secondly， the impact of penalties varies for different banks. Compared with other banks， big banks， large state-owned banks and listed banks obviously show less impact from penalties. Thirdly， capital regulation pressure will affect the inhibitory effect of penalties on risk-taking. Banks with heavier capital regulation pressure are more willing to take risks after receiving penalties. Therefore， while increasing penalties as deterrence， the regulatory authorities should pay close attention to banks under heavier capital regulation pressure to prevent them from taking desperate move and causing serious risk events.

Key words： regulatory penalties the pressure of capital regulation commercial banks risk-taking

Received: 05 June 2022

PACS:

F830

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Qiao-yun
	DUAN Li-qiang

Cite this article:

ZHANG Qiao-yun,DUAN Li-qiang. Impact of Regulatory Penalties and Capital Regulation Pressure on Bank Risk-taking[J]. journal6, 2022, 21(4): 87-99.

URL:

http://xbsk.bjtu.edu.cn/EN/ OR http://xbsk.bjtu.edu.cn/EN/Y2022/V21/I4/87

1 罗璠，詹琪，杨茗.美国金融监管处罚的特征及趋势［J］.西南金融，2019，（9）：81-88.
2 DELIS M D， STAIKOURAS P K，TSOUMAS C. Formal Enforcement Actions and Bank Behavior［J］. Management Science， 2017， 63（4）：959-987.
3 K?STER H， PELSTER M. Financial penalties and bank performance［J］. Journal of Banking & Finance， 2017， 79： 57-73.
4 European Systemic Risk Board. Report on misconduct risk in the banking sector［R/OL］. （2015-06-25）［2022-06-02］. https：//www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/reports/150625_report_misconduct_risk.en.pdf.
5 成洁.资本监管约束下银行资本与风险调整［J］.统计研究，2014，31（2）：68-74.
6 杨新兰.资本监管下银行资本与风险调整的实证研究［J］.国际金融研究，2015，（7）：67-74.
7 张宗新，朱伟骅.我国上市公司信息披露质量的实证研究［J］.南开经济研究，2007，（1）：45-59+116.
8 潘敏，魏海瑞.提升监管强度具有风险抑制效应吗？——来自中国银行业的经验证据［J］.金融研究，2015，（12）：64-80.
9 DELIS M D， STAIKOURAS P K. Supervisory effectiveness and bank risk［J］. Review of Finance， 2011， 15（3）： 511-543.
10 BARTH J R， CAPRIO JR G， LEVINE R. Bank regulation and supervision： what works best？［J］. Journal of Financial intermediation， 2004， 13（2）： 205-248.
11 PASIOURAS F. International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks' technical efficiency： an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis［J］. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting， 2008， 30（2）：187-223.
12 BARTH J R， CAPRIO G， LEVINE R. Bank regulation and supervision in 180 countries from 1999 to 2011［J］. Journal of Financial Economic Policy， 2013， 5（2）：111-219.
13 CHOI S J， PRITCHARD A C . SEC Investigations and Securities Class Actions： An Empirical Comparison［J］. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies， 2016， 13（1）：27-49.
14 宋云玲，李志文，纪新伟.从业绩预告违规看中国证券监管的处罚效果［J］.金融研究，2011，（6）：136-149.
15 REPULLO R. Capital requirements， market power， and risk-taking in banking［J］. Journal of financial Intermediation， 2004， 13（2）： 156-182.
16 NIER E， BAUMANN U. Market discipline， disclosure and moral hazard in banking［J］. Journal of financial intermediation， 2006， 15（3）： 332-361.
17 WU Y ， BOWE R . Information Disclosure， Market Discipline and the Management of Bank Capital： Evidence from the Chinese Financial Sector［J］. Journal of Financial Services Research， 2010， 38（2-3）：159-186.
18 HARRIS M， RAVIV A. How to get banks to take less risk and disclose bad news［J］. Journal of Financial Intermediation， 2014， 23（4）： 437-470.
19 许友传.资本约束下的银行资本调整与风险行为［J］.经济评论，2011，（1）：79-86.
20 刘生福，韩雍.严监管背景下的银行资本调整与风险承担行为——兼论防范和化解金融风险的思路［J］.南开经济研究，2020，（2）：68-91.
21 TADESSE S .The economic value of regulated disclosure： Evidence from the banking sector［J］. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy， 2006， 25（1）：32-70.
22 CAIAZZA S， COTUGNO M， FIORDELISI F， et al. The spillover effect of enforcement actions on bank risk-taking［J］. Journal of Banking & Finance， 2018， 91： 146-159.
23 SAKALAUSKAITE I. Bank risk-taking and misconduct［J］. University of Amsterdam and the Tinbergen Institute Working Paper， 2018.
24 MURPHY D L， SHRIEVES R E， TIBBS S L. Understanding the penalties associated with corporate misconduct： An empirical examination of earnings and risk［J］. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis， 2009， 44（1）： 55-83.
25 LAEVEN L， LEVINE R. Bank governance， regulation and risk taking［J］. Journal of financial economics， 2009， 93（2）： 259-275.
26 WILLIAMS B. Bank risk and national governance in Asia［J］. Journal of Banking & Finance， 2014， 49： 10-26.
27 顾海峰，杨立翔.互联网金融与银行风险承担：基于中国银行业的证据［J］.世界经济，2018，41（10）：75-100.
28 徐明东，陈学彬.货币环境、资本充足率与商业银行风险承担［J］.金融研究，2012，（7）：489+50-62.
29 余明桂，李文贵，潘红波.管理者过度自信与企业风险承担［J］.金融研究，2013，（1）：149-163.
30 王晋斌，李博.中国货币政策对商业银行风险承担行为的影响研究［J］.世界经济，2017，40（1）：25-43.
31 李双建，田国强.银行竞争与货币政策银行风险承担渠道：理论与实证［J］.管理世界，2020，36（4）：149-168.
32 DELL’ARICCIA G， LAEVEN L， SUAREZ G A. Bank leverage and monetary policy’s risk-taking channel： evidence from the United States［J］. the Journal of Finance， 2017， 72（2）： 613-654.
33 RIME B. Capital requirements and bank behaviour： Empirical evidence for Switzerland［J］. Journal of Banking & Finance， 2001， 25（4）： 789-805.