|
|
|
| A Study on the Establishment of China’s Criminal Anti-Monopoly Liability System |
| ZENG Fan-yu1, ZHANG Feng2, CHENG Yan3 |
1.School of Law, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo Zhejiang 315100, China
2.School of Political Science and Law, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang Hubei 441053, China
3.Institution of Social Science, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract According to the newly revised Anti-Monopoly Law in 2022， those who violate the provisions of the Anti-Monopoly Law and constitute a crime will be investigated for criminal responsibility， which is of great significance to the construction of China’s anti-monopoly criminal liability system. It is necessary and rational for China to establish a criminal anti-monopoly liability system based on limited punishment against monopolistic conduct. In view of the differences in the harmfulness of various monopolistic behaviors， the scope of application of limited criminalization of monopolistic conducts should include horizontal monopoly agreements and abuse of market dominance. Among the criminal constituent elements of monopoly crime， the criminal object is the fair competition in the socialist market economic order； the harmful consequences of monopoly crime include significant economic damage and anti-monopoly injury； the criminal subject includes natural persons and units； the subjective aspect of monopoly crime is direct intent that the perpetrators know monopolistic conducts they engaged will inevitably cause harmful consequences such as the exclusion of market competition and damage to consumer welfare， and yet they hope for the occurrence of such consequences. As to the legislative mode， it is suggested that China should adopt the code model that conforms to our legislative tradition， and realize the reasonable connection between anti-monopoly criminal punishment and anti-monopoly administrative punishment.
|
|
Received: 23 May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 吴广海.反垄断法中的刑事责任问题［J］.安徽大学学报（哲学与社会科学版），2007，（3）.
2 金善明.论垄断行为入罪化的限度［J］.北京工业大学学报（社会科学版），2017，（6）.
3 李小明，吴倩.中澳反垄断滥用市场支配地位规制立法比较［J］.财经理论与实践，2013，（3）.
4 ［美］理查德·艾伦·波斯纳.反托拉斯法［M］.孙秋宁译.北京：中国政法大学出版社，2003：313-314.
5 国家反垄断局.中国反垄断执法年度报告（2021）［EB/OL］.（2022-06-08）［2022-10-01］.https：//www.samr.gov.cn/xw/zj/202206/P020220608430645470953.pdf.
6 欧盟委员会.卡特尔案件统计［EB/OL］.（2021-07-12）［2022-10-01］.https：//ec.europa.eu/competition-policy/cartels/statistics_en.
7 美国司法部.刑事执法2021年趋势图［EB/OL］.（2021-11-16）［2022-10-02］.https：//www.justice.gov/atr/criminal-enforcement-fine-and-jail-charts.
8 BAKER D I.The Use of Criminal Law Remedies to Deter and Punish Cartels and Bid-Rigging［J］.George Washington Law Review，2001，（10）.
9 胡建波.垄断犯罪立法研究［M］.北京：中国社会科学出版社，2013：175.
10 SOKOL D D.Reinvigorating Criminal Antitrust［J］.William & Mary Law Review，2019，（4）.
11 张明楷.论刑法的谦抑性［J］.法商研究，1995，（4）.
12 马克昌.外国刑法学总论（大陆法系）［M］.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2009：42-45.
13 许身健.行政性垄断的概念构造及立法完善——基于《反垄断法（修正草案）》的分析［J］.行政法学研究，2022，（3）.
14 邓志松.论行政垄断成因、特点及法律规制［M］.北京：法律出版社，2017：24.
15 戴宾，曾凡宇.纵向价格垄断协议民事诉讼法律问题研究——以强生案为视角展开［J］.法律适用，2016，（3）.
16 马克昌，鲍遂献.略论我国刑法上行为的概念［J］.法学研究，1991，（2）.
17 周光权.刑法中的因果关系和客观归责论［J］.江海学刊，2005，（3）.
18 郑鹏程.论垄断罪的依据、构成与刑事责任［J］.河北法学，2003，（2）. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 22 
