|
|
Effect of Salary Incentive for the Chairman of the Board of Directors (the Secretary of the Party Committee) on Enterprise’s Operating Performance: Based on the State-Owned Enterprises where the Secretary of the Party Committee Holding Concurrent Post as the Chairman of the Board of Directors |
ZHANG Ming-yu1, HAO Jian1, LIU Pan2,3 |
1.School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044,China 2.Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617,China 3.Beijing Academy of Safety Engineering and Technology, Beijing 102617,China |
|
|
Abstract The deployment for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China requires that the secretary of the Party Committee hold concurrent post as the chairman of the board of directors (“two positions into one”). This article, based on the principal-agent theory, incentive theory, tournament theory, etc., takes salary incentive as the starting point to explore an effective way to solve the problem that “two positions into one” has not significantly influenced the operating performance of SOEs. The results show that the salary incentive for the chairman of the board of directors (the secretary of the Party Committee) can significantly improve operating performance of SOEs of “two positions into one”, which is mainly manifested in the local SOEs and SOEs in lower competitive industries. Further research shows that the gender and educational background can significantly moderate the impact of salary incentive for the chairman of the board of directors (the secretary of the Party Committee) on SOEs’ operating performance. In view of this, we should pay high attention to and respectively carry forward the salary incentive for the chairman of the board of directors (the secretary of the Party Committee) of SOEs of “two positions into one”, and integrate the “people-oriented” concept into the process of salary determination, so as to give full play to the incentive effect of the salary.
|
Received: 16 June 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Cite this article: |
ZHANG Ming-yu,HAO Jian,LIU Pan. Effect of Salary Incentive for the Chairman of the Board of Directors (the Secretary of the Party Committee) on Enterprise’s Operating Performance: Based on the State-Owned Enterprises where the Secretary of the Party Committee Holding Concurrent Post as the Chairman of the Board of Directors[J]. journal6, 2023, 22(1): 123-137.
|
|
|
|
URL: |
http://xbsk.bjtu.edu.cn/EN/ OR http://xbsk.bjtu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V22/I1/123 |
1 王元芳,葛晓舰.董事长兼任法定代表人与党委书记会增加公司风险吗?——基于国有上市公司面板数据的分析[J].现代商业,2018,(6):120-122. 2 毛志宏,魏延鹏. 党组织嵌入对信息透明度的影响研究——来自国有企业的经验证据[J]. 软科学,2020,34(8): 12-18. 3 柳学信,孔晓旭,王凯.国有企业党组织治理与董事会异议——基于上市公司董事会决议投票的证据[J].管理世界,2020,36(5):116-133+13. 4 雷海民,梁巧转,李家军.组织特征影响政治资源企业的财务能力吗?——基于中国上市公司的非参数检验[J].中国软科学,2013,(2):144-153. 5 雷海民,梁巧转,李家军.公司政治治理影响企业的运营效率吗——基于中国上市公司的非参数检验[J].中国工业经济,2012,(9):109-121. 6 王元芳,马连福.国有企业党组织能降低代理成本吗?——基于“内部人控制”的视角[J].管理评论,2014,26(10):138-151. 7 郝健,张明玉,王继承.国有企业党委书记和董事长“二职合一”能否实现“双责并履”?——基于倾向得分匹配的双重差分模型[J].管理世界,2021,37(12):195-208. 8 FAMA E F, JENSEN M C. Separation of ownership and control[J]. The journal of law and Economics, 1983, 26(2): 301-325. 9 FAMA E F. Agency problems and the theory of the firm[J]. Journal of political economy, 1980, 88(2): 288-307. 10 JENSEN M C, MECKLING W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of financial economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360. 11 ERIKSSON T. Executive Compensation and Tournament Theory: Empirical Tests on Danish Data[J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 1999, 17(2): 262-280 12 LALLEMAND T, PLASMAN R, RYCX F. Intra-Firm Wage Dispersion and Firm Performance: Evidence from Linked Employer-Employee Data[J]. KYKLOS, 2004, 57(4): 533-558. 13 周权雄,朱卫平.国企锦标赛激励效应与制约因素研究[J].经济学(季刊),2010,9(2):571-596. 14 黎文靖,胡玉明.国企内部薪酬差距激励了谁?[J].经济研究,2012,47(12):125-136. 15 HE L, FANG J. Subnational institutional contingencies and executive pay dispersion[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2016, 33(2): 371-410. 16 李琳,连怡臻.高管薪酬限制政策对国有企业绩效的影响[J].财会月刊,2018,(22):84-92. 17 王玉霞,王浩然,张容芳.上市公司薪酬差距对公司绩效的影响——基于股权集中度的中介效应[J].经济问题,2021,(3):108-115. 18 CHOI S B. The Compensation Gap between Top Management Team (TMT) and Employee, and Firm Performance: Moderating Role of Promotion Probability and Opportunity, and Satisfaction with TMT[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2021, 49(3): 313-326. 19 CARPENTER M A, SANDERS W G. The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on MNC performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2004, 30(4): 509-528. 20 SIEGEL P A, HAMBRICK D C. Pay Disparities Within Top Management Groups: Evidence of Harmful Effects on Performance of High Technology Firms[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(3): 259-274. 21 JASKIEWICZ P, BLOCK J H, MILLER D, et al. Founder versus family owners’ impact on pay dispersion among non-CEO top managers: Implications for firm performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(5): 1524-1552. 22 刘张发,田存志,张潇.国有企业内部薪酬差距影响生产效率吗[J].经济学动态, 2017,(11):46-57. 23 YANG H, KLAAS B S. Pay Dispersion and the Tinancial Performance of the Firm: Evidence from Korea[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2011, 22(10): 2147-2166. 24 PARK J, KIM S. Pay dispersion and organizational performance in Korea: Curvilinearity and the moderating role of congruence with organizational culture[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2017, 28(9): 1291-1308. 25 李倩,焦豪.高管团队内薪酬差距与企业绩效——顾客需求不确定性与企业成长性的双重视角[J].经济管理,2021,43(6):53-68. 26 HENDERSON A D, FREDRICKSON J W. Top Management Team Coordination Needs and the CEO Pay Gap: A Competitive Test of Economic and Behavioral Views[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44 (1): 96-117. 27 胡秀群.地区市场化进程下的高管与员工薪酬差距激励效应研究[J].管理学报, 2016, 13(7):980-988. 28 杨瑞龙,王元,聂辉华.“准官员”的晋升机制:来自中国央企的证据[J].管理世界, 2013,(3):23-33. 29 LAZEAR E P, ROSEN S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts[J]. Journal of political Economy, 1981, 89(5): 841-864. 30 陈翔.国有企业治理中的委托代理问题[J].理论视野,2017,(5):52-55. 31 朱碧新.帕累托最优应成为中央企业EVA绩效评价的目标[J].宏观经济研究,2011,(10): 20-26. 32 代彬. 高管控制权与自利行为研究——来自国有上市公司的经验证据[D]. 重庆:重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 2011. 33 CONYON M J, PECK S I. Board control, remuneration committees, and top management compensation[J]. Academy of management journal, 1998, 41(2): 146-157. 34 步丹璐,张晨宇,林腾.晋升预期降低了国有企业薪酬差距吗?[J].会计研究,2017,(1): 82-88+96. 35 郭淑娟,惠宁.我国垄断行业企业高管薪酬制度研究[J].经济管理,2014,36(9): 91-102. 36 HAMBRICK D C. Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams[J]. California Management Review, 1995, 37(3): 110-127. 37 COWHERD D M, LEVINE D I. Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992: 302-320. 38 余林徽, 陆毅, 路江涌. 解构经济制度对我国企业生产率的影响[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2014,(1):127-150. 39 HAMBRICK D C, MASON P A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of management review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206. 40 WATSON J, MCNAUGHTON M. Gender differences in risk aversion and expected retirement benefits[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2007, 63(4): 52-62. 41 BOOTH A, NOLEN P. Salience, risky choices and gender[J]. Economics Letters, 2012, 117(2): 517-520. 42 CARTER M E, FRANCO F, GINé M. Executive gender pay gaps: The roles of board diversity and female risk aversion[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2017, 34(2): 1232-1264. 43 KULICH C, TROJANOWSKI G, RYAN M K, et al. Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2011, 32(3): 301-321. 44 KIMBERLY J R, EVANISKO M J. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations[J]. Academy of management journal, 1981, 24(4): 689-713. 45 WOZNIAK G D. Human capital, information, and the early adoption of new technology[J]. Journal of Human Resources, 1987: 101-112. 46 WIERSEMA M F, BANTEL K A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change[J]. Academy of Management journal, 1992, 35(1): 91-121. 47 WANG Z Y, ZHU H, WANG Y Q. An Empirical Study on the Background Characteristics of Executives and Enterprise Investment Efficiency[C]. 5th Annual International Conference on Management, Economics and Social Development (ICMESD 2019). Atlantis Press, 2019: 194-199. 48 何韧,王维诚,王军.管理者背景与企业绩效:基于中国经验的实证研究[J].财贸研究,2010,21(1):109-118。 49 华维卿,罗焰.创新型企业高管学历背景与企业绩效的实证研究[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015,(3):120-124. |
|
|
|